Brand new dating of one’s 1674 incorporation in the transcript introduces specific questions; yet not, extracts cited in the same document away from city liberty admissions from company players dating off 1579, taken off corporation instructions, hold the 1576 relationship
Dyers and you may Litsters Source: DCG seven Times off production: 1709-1842 The amount: dos amounts Info of your own Dyers and you may Litsters team, both known as Litsters and you may Dyers. Within his 1615 visitation, Herald Richard St George listed this new incorporation of the organization of the William Wright, alderman, with his a dozen secretary ‘bretheren’, into the eight Summer 1576, but you will find records to help you before (possibly casual) associations from dyers during the Durham from the fifteenth millennium: the new accounts of the Bishop’s bailiff for the Darlington were normal repayments of the dyers off Durham getting lytferme or liteferme, a payment of 26s 8d for an effective dyehouse in the Darlington, when filled (CCB B/68). Extracts (DCRO Du step one/) waiting (from the organization by itself) in the context of the fresh new contested 1761 from the-election include a transcript from an offer out-of incorporation of the characters patent by Bishop John on the 16 November 1674 [sic], authorising a common seal and you will appointing Henry Wanless as the warden and you can John Grey just like the searcher, and get mention out of a buddies guide dating regarding 1623. In the Mickleton and you can Spearman Manuscripts can be found a transcript off a grant produced by Bishop Cosin towards the sixteen Will get 1664 so you can Anthony Emerson, Henry Wanles, John Grey, Richard Beckles, Cuthbert Bellamy, William Flemming and you may Ralph Wescott to form a buddies regarding litsters and dyers within the Durham urban area additionally the parishes out of St Oswald, St Giles, Nothing St Mary and you will St Mary Bow (MSP 91 f.35r-39fv): it grant try probably the way to obtain the fresh extracts (mis)quoted a lot more than. Then transcriptions off ideas level schedules 1650-1772 is available one of the manuscripts out of Robert Surtees and you may Thomas Woodness (DCL), and you will resource is generated about 1711-1712 membership in order to a charter (DCG eight/step 1 p.31). Within the 1943 Whiting noted merely DCG eight/step 1. Out-of 1711 the business is continually misspelled because ‘Lysters’ otherwise ‘Listers’ throughout the info. Facts summaryOrders: 1710-1722, 1750, 1766-1775.Minutes: 1709-1775.Accounts: 1710-1774.Admissions and you can freemen: 1710-1787, 1800-1807, 1830, 1842. Directory regarding apprentice and you can freemen Dyers and you may Litsters Accession record DCG 7/3: discover certainly a plot of land regarding historic cards toward Durham Guilds made by C.Meters. Carlton (1832-1892), transferred during the Durham University Library of the W.A great. Bramwell when you look at the 1937 (Misc.:8), come across Add 1905. DCG 7/1: purchased ?c.1940; throughout the library’s infant custody by 1943; buy said inside the H.M.C. 1951 Report, and Philobiblon, vol. 1, no. 7, 1952. The other Dyers ideas are thought for been accessioned in this higher ingredient Durham Town Guilds and you may Durham City Ideas accessions on 23 November 1955, 31 Will get 1959, 30 July 1959, and you will eleven April 1967.
Apprenticeships: 1713-1727, 1737-1749, 1761
Fullers and you may Thought-companies, Cloth-workers and Walkers Reference: DCG 8 No facts associated with organization has actually yet , already been deposited. The newest Fullers had been provided in term of your Content-experts and you may Walkers because of the Letters Patent out of Bishop Pilkington, 3 February 1565: an inspeximus associated with was enrolled towards 1635 rental, quoted by Surtees (vol. 4, p.23-24). An early recognizance out-of 15 Durham fullers, old twelve March 1447 is based subscribed to the fresh Chancery moves (DURH 3/46 m.23d); and a breach of believe instance is actually introduced the prior’s archidiaconal courtroom by fullers against Richard Smalwod and John Hugheson within the August 1498 having fulling resistant to the ‘regulation of your own artwork of the fullers’, and you can wardens of your own walkers guild were implementing providers ordinances inside the new Crossgate borough court into the 1526: zero ordinances about period 1447-1565 are recognized to getting extant. A rental incorporating the fresh new Cloth-experts [alone] inside the Durham is actually granted of the Bishop James with the ble the fresh new testamentary charitable presents regarding Henry Smith guy (pick DPRI/1/1599/S3), an intend to vertical a walk factory upon several miles of homes with the Brasside ‘nygh and you can up on new River Weare’ gifted of the bishop, and you can demanding the latest content-pros not to prejudice the three related investments regarding Weavers, Fullers and you may Dyers, from Drapers and Tailors, and of Fullers and you can Walkers. Bishop Morton provided another rent on the twenty-five Oct 1635 (DURH 3/108 yards.3d), on the Content-gurus, Walkers, Cloth-fullers, and Content-dressers, Hat-producers, and you can Noticed-producers, appending ordinances of the big date on the 1565 Average: Surtees noted your company’s [following enduring] ideas began from this date, however, not one of these had been considered extant whenever C.Yards. Carlton made a research her or him in the 1860s. Source is established regarding details of your own Dyers and you can Litsters’ company to an event inside 1710 ‘concerning Dyers and Walkers’ (DCG eight/step 1 p.7). Whiting plus cards a keen undated record (as opposed to resource) of your fining regarding a guy entitled Bell getting contravening the fresh organizations change legal rights. The new Durham company got just one user during the 1830, and you can terminated through to their dying. An enthusiastic intervening (and you will untraced) constitution off Bishop Tunstall into Material-pros and Walkercraft is detailed from the Hutchinson (vol. step 1, p.546), estimating away from Rudd’s MSS, who was therefore, probably misreading Spearman’s Inquiry p.19.